<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RBS Tabletalk &#187; Creeds &amp; Confessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/category/creeds-confessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org</link>
	<description>The official blog of Reformed Baptist Seminary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Regulative Principle of Worship in Theological Perspective</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/08/the-regulative-principle-of-worship-in-theological-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/08/the-regulative-principle-of-worship-in-theological-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confessionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecclesiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Domm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Principle of Worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulative Principle of Worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Scriptura]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=2434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ChurchSunset1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2447" title="ChurchSunset" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ChurchSunset1-300x246.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="246" /></a>In two previous posts the doctrine known as the &#8220;Regulative Principle of Worship&#8221; (RPW) was examined from <a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/the-regulative-principle-of-worship-in-historical-perspective/">the perspective of historical theology</a> and from <a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/12/the-regulative-principle-of-worship-in-exegetical-perspective/">the perspective of exegetical theology</a>. In this post, we&#8217;ll look at the RPW from the perspective of systematic theology. A number of specific concerns relative to the systematic formulation of the Regulative Principle will&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/08/the-regulative-principle-of-worship-in-theological-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The New Calvinism Considered&#8221; by Jeremy Walker</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/05/neo-calvinism-considered-by-jeremy-walker/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/05/neo-calvinism-considered-by-jeremy-walker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confessionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecclesiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Mohler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C. J. Mahaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Piper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ligon Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Dever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Driscoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=2241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Young-Restless-Reformed.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2244" title="Young, Restless, Reformed" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Young-Restless-Reformed.jpg" alt="Young, Restless, Reformed" width="253" height="378" /></a>Over the past decade or so, it seems that Christian leaders and church ministries which openly associate themselves with the <em>solas</em> of the Reformation and Calvinistic theology have multiplied. While most of these leaders and churches share a great deal in common with the older Reformed tradition, they are also different in some ways. Accordingly, they&#8217;ve been called (and many&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/05/neo-calvinism-considered-by-jeremy-walker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Student Profile: Bill Hale, Teaching Theology and Translating Reformed Literature in Cambodia</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/05/student-profile-bill-hale-teaching-theology-and-translating-reformed-literature-in-cambodia/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/05/student-profile-bill-hale-teaching-theology-and-translating-reformed-literature-in-cambodia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelism & Missions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Hale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambodia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missionary Outreach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Translation Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=2204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Bill-Hale.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2205" title="Bill Hale" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Bill-Hale.jpg" alt="Bill Hale" width="234" height="187" /></a>Bill Hale is currently enrolled in RBS&#8217;s <a href="http://www.rbseminary.org/marrow_what.php">Marrow of Theology program</a> and is pursuing the Master of Theological Studies (M.T.S.) degree. After visiting Cambodia  several times to help in the work of the ministry and to encourage the  churches, the Lord led Bill and his wife, Jennifer, to relocate there to help share the  gospel and to devote their&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/05/student-profile-bill-hale-teaching-theology-and-translating-reformed-literature-in-cambodia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of the State of Man after Death and of the Resurrection of the Dead: An Exposition of the 1689 London Baptist Confession, XXXI</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/04/of-the-state-of-man-after-death-and-of-the-resurrection-of-the-dead-an-exposition-of-the-1689-london-baptist-confession-xxxi/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/04/of-the-state-of-man-after-death-and-of-the-resurrection-of-the-dead-an-exposition-of-the-1689-london-baptist-confession-xxxi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eternal Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intermediate State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resurrection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=2159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/sunbeam_spectacle.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2161" title="sunbeam_spectacle" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/sunbeam_spectacle-300x200.jpg" alt="sunbeam_spectacle" width="292" height="195" /></a>There is no topic so universally relevant and yet so commonly avoided as death—especially in modern America. Americans are willing to talk about morality, politics, religion, and a host of other hot topics. When it comes to serious reflection upon the significance of death, however, they&#8217;re quick to &#8220;change the subject.&#8221; In fact, most of us spend the majority of&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/04/of-the-state-of-man-after-death-and-of-the-resurrection-of-the-dead-an-exposition-of-the-1689-london-baptist-confession-xxxi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May Christians Challenge Their Elders?</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/03/may-christiains-challenge-their-elders/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/03/may-christiains-challenge-their-elders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reuther</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecclesiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1689 Baptist Confession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laypeople]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=2098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was asked this question recently by a very godly person in our church. The question was asked sincerely and respectfully. I took it seriously and sought to give the best Scriptural answer I could. Here is the essence <img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2100" title="Peace Icon RBS" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Peace-Icon-RBS.PNG" alt="Peace Icon RBS" width="138" height="135" />of my response, made suitable for this presentation. This&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/03/may-christiains-challenge-their-elders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Christian Liberty and Liberty of Conscience: A Brief Exposition of the LBCF XXI</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/03/of-christian-liberty-and-liberty-of-conscience-an-exposition-of-the-lbcf-xxi/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/03/of-christian-liberty-and-liberty-of-conscience-an-exposition-of-the-lbcf-xxi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=2090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Statue-of-Liberty-Symbol-of-Freedom-for-the-Oppressed.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2092" title="Statue-of-Liberty-Symbol-of-Freedom-for-the-Oppressed" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Statue-of-Liberty-Symbol-of-Freedom-for-the-Oppressed.jpg" alt="Statue-of-Liberty-Symbol-of-Freedom-for-the-Oppressed" width="260" height="389" /></a>Modern Christians seem to marginalize the doctrine of Christian liberty. The subject is rarely discussed in any systematic theologies. Even practical books on Christian living often gloss over the topic. For some, the doctrine of Christian liberty is just not that important in relationship to other doctrines of the faith. For others, the doctrine of Christian liberty is too controversial.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2010/03/of-christian-liberty-and-liberty-of-conscience-an-exposition-of-the-lbcf-xxi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May Baptist Churches Use the Adjective &#8220;Reformed&#8221;? The Ongoing Debate</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/may-baptists-use-the-adjective-reformed-the-ongoing-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/may-baptists-use-the-adjective-reformed-the-ongoing-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Confessionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecclesiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1689 Baptist Confession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R. Scott Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed Baptist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=1712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1716" title="RBC of Holland sign" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/RBC-of-Holland-sign.png" alt="RBC of Holland sign" width="272" height="225" />Many Reformed Christians who believe in the validity of infant baptism find it odd that certain Baptist congregations would employ the nomenclature &#8220;Reformed Baptist.&#8221; Indeed, some Reformed ministers and theologians today are accusing Reformed Baptists of something like &#8220;identity theft.&#8221; R. Scott Clark, for example, argues in his recently published book <a href="http://www.wtsbooks.com/product-exec/product_id/5906/nm/Recovering+the+Reformed+Confession%3A+Our+Theology%2C+Piety%2C+and+Practice+%28Paperback%29"><em>Recovering the Reformed Confession</em></a> that a infant baptism&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/may-baptists-use-the-adjective-reformed-the-ongoing-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Quest for Illegitimate Religious Traditionalism (QIRT): A Review of R. Scott Clark&#8217;s Recovering the Reformed Confession by Nicolas Alford</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/the-quest-for-illegitimate-religious-traditionalism-qirt-a-review-of-r-scott-clarks-recovering-the-reformed-confession-by-nicholas-alford/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/the-quest-for-illegitimate-religious-traditionalism-qirt-a-review-of-r-scott-clarks-recovering-the-reformed-confession-by-nicholas-alford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confessionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R. Scott Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Scriptura]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=1684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1685" title="recovering-the-reformed-confession" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/recovering-the-reformed-confession-199x300.jpg" alt="recovering-the-reformed-confession" width="226" height="339" />In <em>Recovering the Reformed Confession: Our Theology, Piety, and Practice, </em>R. Scott Clark argues that modern Reformed churches are in the midst of an identity crisis. Like ships that have lost their moorings in the night and becomes aimlessly adrift at sea, they are without course, without compass, and without captain. It is not Clark&#8217;s aim, however, to point out&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/the-quest-for-illegitimate-religious-traditionalism-qirt-a-review-of-r-scott-clarks-recovering-the-reformed-confession-by-nicholas-alford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Regulative Principle of Worship in Historical Perspective</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/the-regulative-principle-of-worship-in-historical-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/the-regulative-principle-of-worship-in-historical-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Domski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulative Principle of Worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Scriptura]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=1625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1628" title="puritanworship" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/puritanworship.jpg" alt="puritanworship" width="263" height="183" />The concept of the Regulative Principle of worship has been known and applied for centuries. References to “the principle,” “principles of truth,” “rule for regulating,” and the like are scattered throughout older writings. There is, however, some uncertainty about the precise origin of the term “regulative principle of worship.” R. J. Gore finds no explicit mention of it prior to&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/11/the-regulative-principle-of-worship-in-historical-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Lawful Oaths and Vows: An Exposition of the LBCF XXIII</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/07/of-lawful-oaths-and-vows-an-exposition-of-the-lbcf-xxiii/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/07/of-lawful-oaths-and-vows-an-exposition-of-the-lbcf-xxiii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1689 Baptist Confession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oaths & Vows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=1320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1321" title="56543028" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/swearinganoath-president.jpg" alt="56543028" width="255" height="175" />In the 17th century, certain sects of Christendom, such as the Quakers and Anabaptists, denied the legitimacy of taking oaths or making vows. The teaching of this chapter of the confession was designed to clarify the meaning and confirm the lawfulness of oaths and vows when properly used.  The 1689 Baptist Confession retains the substance of the Westminster Confession, but&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/07/of-lawful-oaths-and-vows-an-exposition-of-the-lbcf-xxiii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
