<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RBS Tabletalk &#187; Passions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/tag/passions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org</link>
	<description>The official blog of Reformed Baptist Seminary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gerety&#8217;s Hammer Misses the Mark: A Rejoinder to Sean Gerety&#8217;s &#8220;Irrational Baptists&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/06/geretys-hammer-misses-the-mark/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/06/geretys-hammer-misses-the-mark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropopathism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Offer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impassibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Gerety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=1177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1182" title="hammer-hits-thumb" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/hammer-hits-thumb.jpg" alt="hammer-hits-thumb" width="290" height="210" />I recently posted a brief article entitled, <a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/05/god-makes-a-wish-that-each-and-every-sinner-might-be-saved/">&#8220;God Makes a Wish: That Each and Every Sinner Might Be Saved.&#8221;</a> The article was basically an exposition of Deuteronomy 5:29, a text that portrays God as wishing for the saving good of those who never experience that good. Such a conclusion, as the late Reformed theologian John Murray noted, supports the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/06/geretys-hammer-misses-the-mark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“There Is No Pain, You Are Misreading”: Is God “Comfortably Numb”? Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/02/%e2%80%9cthere-is-no-pain-you-are-misreading%e2%80%9d-is-god-%e2%80%9ccomfortably-numb%e2%80%9d-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/02/%e2%80%9cthere-is-no-pain-you-are-misreading%e2%80%9d-is-god-%e2%80%9ccomfortably-numb%e2%80%9d-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropopathism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Warfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Hodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregory Nichols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impassibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Boyce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Calvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-640" title="earth-eyetear" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/earth-eyetear.jpg" alt="earth-eyetear" width="265" height="172" />According to Genesis 6:6, God felt emotional pain as he assessed the proliferation of human sin and misery on the earth. But as we noted in <a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/02/there-is-no-pain-you-are-misreading-is-god-comfortably-numb/">Part 1 of this series</a>, some classical and Reformed Bible scholars caution the reader against reading emotions predicated of God literally. “Certainly,” writes John Calvin, “God is not sorrowful or sad; but remains&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/02/%e2%80%9cthere-is-no-pain-you-are-misreading%e2%80%9d-is-god-%e2%80%9ccomfortably-numb%e2%80%9d-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;There Is No Pain, You Are Misreading&#8221;: Is God &#8220;Comfortably Numb&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/02/there-is-no-pain-you-are-misreading-is-god-comfortably-numb/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/02/there-is-no-pain-you-are-misreading-is-god-comfortably-numb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anselm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Augustine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Warfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Hodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis Turretin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Nichols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immutability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impassibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Boyce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Calvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Owen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Muller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Waldron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Aquinas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1140" title="earth-eyetear1" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/earth-eyetear1.jpg" alt="earth-eyetear1" width="287" height="186" />Gerhard von Rad, an OT scholar, aptly depicts the spread of human sin after the Fall as “an avalanche.”<sup><a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/02/there-is-no-pain-you-are-misreading-is-god-comfortably-numb/#footnote_0_629" id="identifier_0_629" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Gerhard von Rad, Old Testament Theology, trans. D. M. G. Stalker (Peabody: Prince Press, 2005), 1:154, 168.">1</a></sup> This avalanche accelerates to such staggering pro­portions that God is forced to visit the world in a catastrophic flood-judgment (7:6-24). But prior to the judgment itself, God evaluates the human condition in Genesis 6:5 and issues a judgment oracle in 6:7.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2009/02/there-is-no-pain-you-are-misreading-is-god-comfortably-numb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, We May Be Passionate: A Friendly Response to Dr. James Renihan’s &#8220;Are You Passionate?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2008/11/yes-we-may-be-passionate-a-friendly-response-to-dr-james-renihan%e2%80%99s-are-you-passionate/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2008/11/yes-we-may-be-passionate-a-friendly-response-to-dr-james-renihan%e2%80%99s-are-you-passionate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deangonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creeds & Confessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confessionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Renihan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passionate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rbseminary.org/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/man-praying.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-343" title="man-praying" src="http://blog.rbseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/man-praying.gif" alt="man-praying" width="262" height="198" /></a>Recently, Dr. James Renihan published on his blog an entry entitled, “Are You Passionate?” (June 3, 2008), which the reader may access <a href="http://www.reformedbaptistinstitute.org/?p=105">here</a>. He begins the post with the remark,  “Evangelical preachers and writers have become passionate about being passionate.” “We are urged,” says Renihan, “to have a passion for God, to be passionate about winning souls, to be&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rbseminary.org/2008/11/yes-we-may-be-passionate-a-friendly-response-to-dr-james-renihan%e2%80%99s-are-you-passionate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
